Public roads looking to load and resistance factor rating. Aug 17, 2016 hl93 design truck formerly, hs2044 truck hl93 design tandem formerly, alternate military design lane load. Truck loads consist of p1, p2 and p3 axle loads, and wllu uniform load per lane. It has 3 basic live loads for bridges called hl 93 loading where h stands for highway and l stands for loading, developed in 1993. This reaction from the live load uniform load is distributed over a 10 ft. For m or reactions at interior piers, two 90% design trucks spaced at least 50ft. Pdf wim based calibration of aashto lrfd live load model. This section will present applicable loads and provide guidance to mndots practice for the application of these loads.
Hl93 design tandem consist of twin axles spaced 4 1. Once overload permitting and bridge posting policies are revised to accommodate lrfr, load ratings using the lfd and asd methods will be discontinued. The live load calculator aims to find maximum live load moment under a choice of truck models. Aashto hl93 loading highway design free download as word doc. Evolution of design methodologies contd as a result. The vehicular live loading for lrfd is designated hl93 figure 21, which consists of a combination of the. Review of hl 93 bridge traffic load model using an extensive wim database. Designing timber highway bridge superstructures using aashto. In 2001 aashto adopted a new guide manual for condition evaluation and load and resistance factor rating lrfr of highway bridges. Lrfd steel design ohio department of transportation. It has 3 basic live loads for bridges called hl93 loading where h stands for highway and l stands for loading, developed in 1993. Wim based calibration of aashto lrfd live load model hl93 for highway bridges design of pakistan.
Aashto lrfd bridge design specification hl 93 loading with the exception that the design tandem portion of the hl 93 load definition shall be replaced by a single 60 kip axle load before application of this 1. Aashto hl93 loading hs2044, design truck, design tandem. Chapter bridge load rating page 4 wsdot bridge design manual m 2350. The overall matrix is generic for wsdot design, but there is a line in the matrix that outlines the. Design shall be in accordance with lrfd sections 3, 4, 5, 9, and vdot modifications. Live load moment calculator aashtolrfd hl93 load model. The h30si standard plans have been redesigned for hl93 loading under the aashto lrfd specifications and now have been reissued. Traffic loading for standard and routine permit vehicles is represented by the hl 93 load model. Public roads looking to load and resistance factor. Aashto lrfd bridgeaashto lrfd bridge design specifications josh beakley august, 2010. Aashto hl 93 vehicular live load is a combination of three different loads, hl 93 design truck formerly, hs2044 truck. Bridge design manual lrfd 12 txdot 012020 chapter 1 about this manual section 1 introduction section 1 introduction implementation load and resistance factor design lrfd is a design methodology that makes use of load and resistance factors based on the known variability of applied loads and material properties.
Live load reaction on the intermediate pier from one traffic lane is determined. The aashto lrfd design vehicular live load, designated hl93, is a modified version of the hs20 highway loadings from the aashto. Hl93 loading to piers for simple spans bridge engineering. Load and resistance factor design lrfd for deep foundations. The use of aashto lrfd bridge design specifications with. Hl93 is a type of theoretical vehicular loading proposed by aashto in 1993. Load and resistance factor design lrfd for highway bridge. The following design vehicular live load cases described in aashtolrfd are considered. References to the aashto lrfd bridge design specifications are included throughout the design example. They dont teach it in college anymore moving forward net load effect difference between hl93 and hs2044 loading is very small. Trucks in one lane divided by corresponding hl93 moment. Aashto more than 10 years ago cant be used with new lrfd specs without additional calibration. The bridge is designed with the load and resistance factor design method lrfd in accordance with the aashto lrfd a bridge design specifications, second edition dated 1998 with the 1999 thru 2003 interims, using hl93 live loading.
The hl93 live load is the design live load for bridges designed under load and resistance factor design lrfd. As expected, this increases the hl93 loading by 25%. In previous aashto specifications, the dynamic load allowance was termed impact, and in the lrfd specifications, dynamic load allowance is abbreviated as im. Chapter 17 superstructure general january 2020 173 17.
This design example is based on load and resistance factor design lrfd, as presented in the aashto lrfd bridge design specifications. The term lane load is new and applies to design of above grade bridge decks. Analyze for hl93 live load and all the mndot g80 and g07 standard permit trucks. West virginia department of transportation division of highways. This is intended to generate the 75year return period load effect for normal vehicular use of the bridge aashto 2010. Aashto lrfd bridge design specification hl93 loading with the exception that the design tandem portion of the hl93 load definition shall be replaced by a single 60 kip axle load before application of this 1. Volume iii us lrfd bridge section version 3 3 3 4 3. Among the impermanent loads on bridge structures, the most frequent one is a vehicular live load and plays a key role in design of the bridge components most of the developed countries have a comprehensive highway bridge design specification while. Aashto aashto 12,00 lb per std hs 20 load alternate load. Aashto lrfd bridge design specifications aashto lrfd. Loads and load factors the loads section of the aashto lrfd specifications is greatly expanded over that found in the standard specifications.
Reason for proposing this live load model is to prescribe a set of loads such that it produces extreme load effect approximately same as that produced by the exclusion vehicles. They dont teach it in college anymore moving forward net load effect difference between hl 93 and hs2044 loading is very small. This is confirmed in astm c1577, which states that the tables were created using the aashto hl 93 live load without the lane load as permitted by aashto. Aashto lrfd 4 th edition suggests the use of a modification f actor to the hl 93 load to provide a more accurate portrayal of the loading effects of heavier lfd design loads such as hs25.
Lrfd bridge design specifications, for the most part the dynamic load allowance for the hl93 liveload model is specified in. Aashto lrfd bridgeaashto lrfd bridge design specifications josh beakley. Calculator offers options for hl 93, kgm45, and a manual selection of live load model. Aashto lrfd bridge design specifications, 6th edition. Aashto lrfd bridgeaashto lrfd bridge design specifications. Aashto references for uniformity and simplicity, this design example is based on the aashto lrfd bridge design specifications seventh edition, 2014, including the 2015 interim specifications. The major conceptual change with respect to the aashto standard speci. Chapter bridge load rating washington state department. Dynamic load allowance is set 33% of static weight of truck model and is not applied to the uniform load per aashtolrfd. It is used as the design loading for highway structures in usa. For cases where a permit truck or an emergency vehicle is combined. New and young designers dont even know what lfd,asd and hs2044 are.
Aashto lrfd bridge design specifications, customary u. Recently, we were made aware of some technical revisions that need to be applied to the aashto lrfd bridge design specifications, 6th edition. Load and resistance factor design lrfd takes into account both the statistical mean resistance and the statistical mean loads. The hl93 load model under the lrfd methodology is equivalent to the h20hs20 model truck in combination with the hs20 uniform lane loading. Since all new bridges are now rated using the lrfr method, an internal study was completed to ensure that aashto hl. It is used as the design loading for highway structures in usa and other countries where aashto code is followed. Designing timber highway bridge superstructures using. Revised load and resistance factors for the aashto lrfd. As expected, this increases the hl 93 loading by 25%. The guide manual reflects the most current technologies and builds on the structural reliability approach inherent in specifications for load and resistance factor design lrfd. A direct correlation to what was done in lfd would suggest using a modification factor of 1. The vehicular live loading for lrfd is designated hl93 figure 21, which consists of.
Please replace the existing text with the corrected text to ensure that your edition is both accurate and. The aashto lrfd bridge design specifications aashto 2010 are used for bridge design in the united states. The higher lrfd design loads generated by hl93 live load criteria are nearly equivalent to hs2544 live load criteria designated by the asd specifications. This is a hypothetical live load model proposed by aashto for analysis of bridges. In spite of the significant differences in live load surcharge ppp yressures, their impact on reinforcement areas is. The goal of these simplifications is to allow the substructure to be analyzed as a twodimensional frame. The higher lrfd design loads generated by hl 93 live load criteria are nearly equivalent to hs2544 live load criteria designated by the asd specifications. The design tandem consists of two 25kip axles spaced 4. In addition, live load deflection criteria is set at span425 for lrfd, which is slightly less. Dynamic load allowance is set 33% of static weight of truck model and is not applied to the uniform load per aashto lrfd. These load combinations correspond to four limit states, service, fatigue, fracture, strength and extremeevent.
Introduction to lrfd 12 evolution of design methodologies contd sld does not recognize that some types of loads are more variable than others. Design step 7 design of substructure prestressed concrete. Aashto hl93 loading highway design bridge truck scribd. It is commonly called as hs20 44 where h stands for highway, s for semitrailer, 20 ton weight of the tractor 1st two axles and was proposed in 1994 2. Design specifications, hereafter referred to as aashto lrfd. The use of aashto lrfd bridge design specifications with culverts.
Units, 5th edition, with 2010 interim revisions, includes june 2010 errata historical version aashto lrfdus4m. Hl93 is used in load rating when calculating the federal inventory and operating rating for bridges. The aashto model hl93 consists of a load per unit bridge length plus a threeaxle truck. Please refer to the latest edition of the aashto lrfd bridge design specifications4 for details of this design load.
Introduction to lrfd 18 resistance factors article 6. Load and resistance factor design lrfd for highway. Live load distribution factor is usually computed to determine the force effect for an individual girder. Lfd provides recognition that types of loads are different. Midspan live load moment is calculated using span length and dynamic load allowance values for the given truck model. Multiplication bending moment factor for aashto live.
I think each span in lrfd should have a truck placed right at the support regardless whether its fied or simple plus the lane load. Design examples and commentary throughout the manual are intended to serve as a. The aashto model hl93 consists of a load per unit bridge length plus a threeaxle truck or tandem axle load, whichever gives the greater load effect aashto 2010. Equation 1 is the basic design formula for structural. The nysdot bridge manual supplements both the lrfd specifications and the standard specifications for highway bridges. The bridge is designed with the load and resistance factor design method lrfd in accordance with the aashto lrfd a bridge design specifications, second edition dated 1998 with the 1999 thru 2003 interims, using hl 93 live loading. As with h20hs20 loading, aashto established hl93 as a standard model for live loads, so it does not represent an actual vehicle. Concrete deck slabs on bridges designed in accordance with aashto lrfd for hl93 loading. The standard bridges designed according to the aashto standard specifications were withdrawn. The h30si bridges have seven lengths from 468 to 1100 and skews of 0, 15, and 30 degrees. The nysdot bridge manual supplements both the lrfd specifications and the. The aashto lrfd bridge design specifications aashto 2010 are used for bridge. Aashto lrfd humans do not feel deflections, they feel the.
Details of application and calculation of design vehicular live load is explained in aashto bridge design specifications cl 3. What nature of truck does it represent in the summer 2009 issue of aspire, part 1 of the discussion of the hl93 notional live load model discussed the reason for developing the new model and compared hl93 with the hs2044 live load model of the aashto standard specifications for highway. Hl 93 is used in load rating when calculating the federal inventory and operating rating for bridges. To obtain maximum negative moments, a pair of tandems should be considered, spaced at 8. Hl93 aashto vehicular live loading truck tandem design. Hl 93 is a type of theoretical vehicular loading proposed by aashto in 1993.
1338 1398 1501 197 961 667 723 732 228 228 942 1146 1571 442 1045 181 371 81 289 127 42 766 1372 71 1500 1467 891 1271 1474 839 343 676 1072 742 1063 1017 1157